Posted by Dave


What do camels have to do with proving the Bible wrong?

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

No Flash Support? Use this Audio Player!

Download the MP3


Audio Transcript

Dave: Camels!

Jeff: Camels?

Dave: The TV Show “Big Bang Theory” as well as National Geographic, and others, have suggested that the Bible is wrong about camels.

Jeff: The claim is that archeological evidence demonstrates that camels appeared in the middle-east much later than Abraham’s time.

Dave: Of course, the Bible describes Abraham as having camels.

Jeff: So, skeptics take this as evidence against the Bible’s reliability.

Dave: Nat Geo even said “This supports earlier studies that have challenged the Bible’s veracity as a historic document” (Feb 10, 2014).

Jeff: But is that the case? First off, we must note that archeological studies cannot prove a negative – they cannot show that camels weren’t present in Abraham’s time.

Dave: Furthermore, Abraham was nomadic. Even if it was true that camels weren’t widespread during those periods it is entirely plausible that Abraham owned some.

Jeff: If Abraham owned a few thousand camels that he picked up during his travels, there would likely be no archeological evidence.

Dave: And the Bible never claims that camels were widespread in the region.

Jeff: Give the Bible a little credit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *