Posted by Dave

psalms

Should the fact that some of the Bible is derived from Oral Tradition lessen it’s impact?

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.


No Flash Support? Use this Audio Player!

Download the MP3

COMMENT BELOW!

Audio Transcript

Dave: Some have pointed out that the Bible stories sometimes come from oral tradition.

Jeff: Is that true? Sure! Does that mean the Bible is not accurate? No.

Dave: The concept of their being an oral tradition that turned into a written record is known as “Source Criticism” or “Form Criticism”

Jeff: Now, in themselves it’s kind of a cool thing. They’re trying to figure out how the Biblical writings came to be – what were the sources?

Dave: But, the danger is that we judge something based on our best guesses of where the information came from, rather than on its own merit.

Jeff: For instance, In Luke 4:5-9 Satan takes Jesus up to a high place. The Bible says he shows him “all the Kingdoms of the world”

Dave: But the world is round – it’s impossible to see everything at once!

Jeff: Just read it on its own merits; oral tradition or not we know the writer was using some hyperbole to make his point.

Dave: So, was that an oral tradition? Maybe! But is this a true account? Well, there’s no reason to oppose it!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *